Med Match ForumMed Match Forum
Med Match Forum

Med Match Forum

← Back·Post #103
0

Echoing a post below, RYs are almost mandatory now if you take a look at the recent match, seems like something changed in PDs eyes about matching them, probably a huge bottleneck in reapps. Not meant to scare you but if you check the old spreadsheet theres a lot of talk of similar too. Chat am I cooked with no RY?

#1034d ago

my friend had no RY and got like 18 interviews. i think it's hit or miss

4d ago
0

This is not true and don't be discouraged by this. I had over 15 interviews from a low tier school without a RY. All the people I met on aways who did RY did not match. It is so not necessary, and many PDs are getting very sick of the research arms race

4d ago
0

I totally agree. I said it below and I'll say it again, I do not think you need a RY to match and match well as long as you and mentors feel confident about your app. I know several ppl last year and this year who matched T20s with no RY

4d ago
0

I'm from a mid tier school and had 11 interviews, did no RY and did not decide on derm til the start fo 3rd year

4d ago
0

from a state school and had 3 of us match with no RY this year so dw. i think people are gravitating towards quality

4d ago
0

quantity of research lately and on one of my aways had a past PD who said that they really dislike applicants having RYs

4d ago
1

no RY and 13 interviews here

4d ago
0

how many pubs tho

3d ago
0

disliking applicants who do RYs is such a crazy blanket statement?

3d ago
0

had 30 research items personally (manus, posters, abstracts, etc) with no RY

1d ago
0