Someone deleted my message (probably someone from DermLinkScholars). I said I worked with Derm Link Scholars and wanted advice on if I should remove my publication with them from my CV since doctors have said it's unethical and low-quality research published in shitty journals that accept everyone who pays.
12 pubs in 1 year is ridiculous. unless ur PI is on the board of a journal it takes months for papers to get accepted
I mean "submitted" things count
does it? I recall the PD at Penn during the USC panel saying that anyone can say they "submitted" something so I'm worried they don't really value those
I have heard anecdotally that people have been asked in interviews to provide updates, so that may be one way that they verify "submitted" things ?
yeah submitted things count but im referring to them saying 12 things published
I was reffering to actual publications (not research items). Not saying it to scare anyone as I think research is just one part of your application in addition leadership, volunteering etc, so you can get in with less. Also basic science is dif very different from clinical. Just in my experience I have interacted with mentors that say 12-15+ . Just looking at Mayo, Mt Sinai, Albert Einstien, UM. California, Northwestern those are what some would consider productive
12+ if clinical, basic science isnt as much as clinical. have seen on average RY
applicantsget to 20+ on pubmed for their RYs.
20+ pubs or just research items in general? did basic science, and got 6 research items, with one manuscript in publication, would this be considered productive?
12+ pubs or items?
Recently matched after a basic science RY. I had 1 major pub that barely got published in time for ERAS. Basic science papers take forever and people reading your app know that. Supplemented with case reports and review papers. As a side note: for those applying after taking a basic science RY, please please please carefully evaluate what programs you apply to. Most schools that don't value research will not view you as a great fit and you're less likely to get an interview. < adding on to this that if you have a bunch of pubs and applying somewhere where they don't value research / residents don't have a bunch of pubs - same thing, you wont be seen as a great fit to interview or take as a resident
I mean "submitted" things count
does it? I recall the PD at Penn during the USC panel saying that anyone can say they "submitted" something so I'm worried they don't really value those
I have heard anecdotally that people have been asked in interviews to provide updates, so that may be one way that they verify "submitted" things ?
yeah submitted things count but im referring to them saying 12 things published
I was reffering to actual publications (not research items). Not saying it to scare anyone as I think research is just one part of your application in addition leadership, volunteering etc, so you can get in with less. Also basic science is dif very different from clinical. Just in my experience I have interacted with mentors that say 12-15+ . Just looking at Mayo, Mt Sinai, Albert Einstien, UM. California, Northwestern those are what some would consider productive
Hard to say, depends on if you did basic or clinical research. I'd just compare your productivity with your PI's other fellows or prior fellows to see where you stand
12+ if clinical, basic science isnt as much as clinical. have seen on average RY
applicantsget to 20+ on pubmed for their RYs.
20+ pubs or just research items in general? did basic science, and got 6 research items, with one manuscript in publication, would this be considered productive?
12+ pubs or items?
Recently matched after a basic science RY. I had 1 major pub that barely got published in time for ERAS. Basic science papers take forever and people reading your app know that. Supplemented with case reports and review papers. As a side note: for those applying after taking a basic science RY, please please please carefully evaluate what programs you apply to. Most schools that don't value research will not view you as a great fit and you're less likely to get an interview. < adding on to this that if you have a bunch of pubs and applying somewhere where they don't value research / residents don't have a bunch of pubs - same thing, you wont be seen as a great fit to interview or take as a resident