Apparently we're not allowed to post interview invites from top programs on this spreadsheet (see Yale, UCSF)
Mar 23
0
Harvard, Stanford, Penn, and NYU will crash the sheet
Mar 23
0
Mid or low-tier program sends out an invite -> "Congrats! Internal or external? Any ties to the program?" vs Top-tier program send out an invite "I DIDNT GET AN INVITE THERE SO YOU MUST BE A TROLL. WHY ARE YOU COMMENTING ANONYMOUSLY? LIARRRRRRRRR"
Mar 23
0
Please stop. This is not productive.
Mar 23
0
0
Stanford invite!!! Holy crap. Through ERAS - 1/12/18.
hmmm stanford doesn't traditionally use ERAS for invites
Mar 23
0
The email was through ERAS but there was no ERAS scheduling (since there's only 1 date)
Mar 23
0
the denial is apparently still alive and well here
Mar 23
0
But... but... It's November, which is the 11th month of the year, and 1=2, where the 2nd letter in Stanford is "t," meaning that Stanford gives out invites on Tuesdays. IT'S A TROLL, EVERYBODY!
Mar 23
0
Stanford typically does internals on separate date - not this year?
Mar 23
0
Stanford didn't release anything lol
Mar 23
0
are you sure, how do you know? Was this the troll too? I was wondering ... MODERATORS: any news on whether this stanford thing was a troll or not?
Mar 23
0
Please don't let this turn into a UCSF-style debacle. I got an interview - you can choose to believe it or not. I love how no one questions Case Western, Vandy, or Minnesota.
Mar 23
0
Thanks! I believe you, was just confused by all these unhelpful comments. Do you mind telling me if you're external or an internal student/away rotator? I really appreciate it.
Mar 23
0
No problem, external with ties to CA I thanks!!
Mar 23
0
0
Hi all. Just wanted to let everyone know that several of us have checked with Stanford residents and faculty. We have confirmed that no interviews have gone out.
Stanford invite!!! external, non rotator x4 l cue the angry denials about how this person is lying? l Nah, today I believe it. Congrats, person! x2 l Contact method?
Yale def did (I got a call), but Stanford doesnt do RTM calls and UCSF hasnt done them yet from what i was told by the PC
Mar 23
0
Stanford did not make RTM calls. Above we were saying they may call all people they interview to ask for questions. haven't done it yet it seems though,
Mar 23
0
I got an explicit RTM call from Stanford
Mar 23
0
Stanford doesn't do RTM calls, stop lying to troll us.
Mar 23
0
Man there are some sadistic assholes on this spreadsheet. The thought of potentially being a co-resident with one of them is terrifying x2
I'm pretty sure this said UCSF ranked-to-match earlier?
Mar 23
0
No it said Stanford. That troll (anonymous gopher) changed it to other things like UCSF and BU and I kept changing it back. I'm the OP.
Mar 23
0
This same troll has been doing that for weeks. He changed one of my posts from "UCSF" to "Kentucky" a few weeks ago.
Mar 23
0
A user claimed that he/she received a RTM call from Stanford. You can choose to believe it or not believe it. OP will refrain from commenting further due to vicious attacks from the first time it was posted.
Mar 23
0
0
Man forget about Stanford RTM call, i didn't even get a "any lingering questions" call people are saying they do
^ someone is deleting all the comments that were left on this (probably going along with trying to make people look bad intentionally).
Mar 23
0
If Mods can restore the comments, that'd be good.
Mar 23
0
Comments that are deleted seem to be deleted for good.. I'm not sure how this person is deleting the comments though as even the users w/ access don't have this function. If anyone has ideas, please chime in.
Mar 23
0
You don't need access to delete comments. If a comment is pending approval, you can edit, resolve, or delete it.
Mar 23
0
Can anyone delete (not resolve) my test comment? When you resolve, there's still a history of the comment having been there in the comment history.
Mar 23
0
Now the option to delete and resolve are gone...maybe it's because you're posting as someone who is signed in? It may be different when anonymous posters post. I can delete the anonymous comment below but not the comment from Anoni moose.
Mar 23
0
Yeah you're right. I guess the moral of the story is to sign in to comment even if you don't have access.
Mar 23
0
This was the exact issue with the above posts. The troll kept changing the comments to ridiculous things because you could just edit and change the anonymous users posts.
Mar 23
0
0
^^Just seeing the Stanford stuff now. Did anyone else get a call from them? Not RTM call but a call for answering any questions?
Stanford has NOT made RTM calls. Straight from the PD.
Mar 23
0
But have they made calls for questions?
Mar 23
0
I have not been a part of the above conversations at all, but I will say I did get a call which was simply a check-in for questions, but it was not a RTM call. I honestly wouldn't believe the above RTM stuff because people have been posting fake stuff about Stanford all cycle (including fake interview invites), so I suspect this is no different. For what it's worth, the above conversation started well before I got a check-in call, so I think that potentially makes it seem more likely to be fake.
Mar 23
0
So is your PD confirming the RTM call?
Mar 23
0
Also, to be clear because this situation was/is very confusing. I was the OP of the right side column only where the troll was changing everything. I am NOT the OP (I think it was "derm applicant" or something like that) who first wrote about the RTM call on the left side (perhaps my use of "OP" made things more confusing). I came in in support of him/her honestly, but I don't think it was clear that there were two of us contributing to the conversation...
Mar 23
0
No. I am not confirming the RTM call. I asked my PD about it and she asked where I had heard about it but neither confirmed nor denied it. On the spreadsheet, I saw a user post about the RTM, get trolled, and then respond with some disparaging comments about middle America, and I wanted to warn him/her before my PD or someone recognizes who he/she was. But sorry. I still don't know whether or not RTM calls went out.
Mar 23
0
Lol, repeating/rehashing what the OP(s?) said on here isn't really making them look good if the PDs were to see this now. Prob should delete this conversation too if previous stuff was too lol
Mar 23
0
Yes, please delete this section. I was trying to explain the situation to OP and whoever just posted asking to clarify, but please delete this now that it's all been settled.
Mar 23
0
It doesn't matter if this all stays here. The person who posted all the Stanford stuff probably wasn't even someone who interviewed at Stanford since it was untrue! Everyone here is a troll.
Mar 23
0
Nope, pretty sure it was a douchebag who wanted to brag about his/her RTM call.
Mar 23
0
Trying to be malicious to these OPs for posting about a call isn't helpful. Even if what they posted is true, Stanford made many calls and it's hard to know who wrote this, so leaving all this won't "trace" things to anyone. Plus, it's still very possible that some random person posted all this and not an interviewee
Mar 23
0
0
Why are positive comments about NYU and Stanford being deleted?
dont act dumb. people are gunners. shit is getting changed in an attempt to manipulate people. It has happened every year and it is hapening again this year. get over it. dont make decisions based on those comments. it is out of our control.
Mar 23
0
Someone is also deleting positive comments for UCSF and Northwestern...
Mar 23
0
0
anyone interview at stanford and did NOT get any call from them?|
Apparently we're not allowed to post interview invites from top programs on this spreadsheet (see Yale, UCSF)