Loma Linda! <x3
Loma Linda University-CA
Loma LindaLoma Linda, CA
- NRMP
- 1024080A0
- ACGME
- 0800521111
Applicant sentiment — from 60 anonymous posts, 2017–2027
4.3 / 10
What anonymous posters said
Anonymous posters frequently discussed Loma Linda's interview-day presentation requirement and described the application and scheduling process as sometimes confusing. Several commenters offered mixed opinions on the program's reputation among California options, while some recommended completing an away rotation there to improve match chances.
AI-generated summary of opinions expressed in anonymous, unverified posts. It describes what posters wrote, not verified facts about this program. Based on these 60 posts · Updated Aug 2026 · Contest or respond to this entry · Takedown & right of reply
Fame & Shame
2025–2026 Derm
1 entry✅1. The kindest and most down-to-earth department chair I have ever encountered. I regret not ranking them higher in hindsight.
Related programs
Also discussed alongside
Page 3 of 4
folks who interviewed at Loma Linda, how did it go?
Anyone knows anything about loma Linda's panel interview? Kinda freaking out here< you'll be fine, just know your app inside out and make sure you memorized solid answers to the basic behavioral questions
Loma Linda II x4
Anyone from loma linda can talk about how the selection process work up there? Do residents have a say?
Anyone arriving at ONT airport tomorrow morning for Loma Linda and want to rideshare over to the Loma Linda area?
How does a change in program director affect a program and your interest in that program? Loma Linda has a new PD. I have heard rumours of other PDs moving. Do you know others who are moving? Also big name derms. I liked one program a lot for one doctor, but at my next interview another program said that they were recruiting him.
Loma Linda interview, x3 (internal x1, external x5)
< any external (non-rotators)?
yes!
External, non rotator, no ties. X1 << dates? 1/30 and 1/31 << thanks!
just got the loma linda interview- external, non rotator. dates are 1/30 and 1/31
Does anyone have insight on UCLA?
heard it used to be great, but there have been some turnover with faculty (many leaving to USC, which is now considered a better program by some)> they have very little info on the website<anyone have any idea when the interview day will end?
email said around 1 oh please, I just hate the lies some times. USC as a health system was recently on probation. They are not jumping from UCLA in droves to USC.
this is actually not true - several faculty have been poached from UCLA to USC (in "droves") <yes, including USC's current PD and head Mohs surgeon.
before or after probation issues? Also 2 people don't constitute 'droves'
some after, some before. probation issues had nothing to do with the derm department. there are more than those 2.
either you have a UCLA invite and not a USC invite, or you haven't spent much time with both depts...
you don't have to believe me, look up their faculty list and see for yourself
☕☕☕
um, UCLA has like 8 more faculty than USC
quality, not quantity honey
<not a top CA program <There are many solid CA programs and UCLA is included in that. I know someone who ranked UCLA over UCSF & Stanford partially for locations reasons, but they did not feel like they were sacrificing quality of education. <Great location, but still not a top program compared to every others in CA. <true
not true
Stanford & UCSF are on another level, then UCSD, then UC-davis, UCLA & USC
would consider lower tier program. Not a department (it's a division under medicine) so there is limited upside for improvements. Location is amazing though if you want to be in SoCal x4 .
Would not say low tier. Would pick it above most of the 100+ programs, but not top tier/upper
In order: Stanford/USCF, UCSD, UC-Davis, UCLA, USC, UC-Irvine, Loma Linda/UCLA-Harbor, Kaiser Permanente, Opti West (Newport)
UCLA and UC Davis are not above USC
This one line represents the horrible sabotage that is going to plague every question about california programs this season
This whole thread is ridiculous. Pick whichever CA program suits you the best. Derm reputations are mostly based on how long the program has been around and how much research money they have. Remember that matching at a "top tier derm program" may be seen as > matching to other programs, but they're >>>>>>>>> not matching. Regardless, you'll be the envy of every other non-derm doctor
Predications for this week? Maybe UCLA, Brown?
arent those the only two left? what about casewestern?
there's a lot left (loma linda, case western, einstein, brown ucla, fsu, temple, baylor in dallas, etc.)
I have about 10 places I applied to that have not sent invites/external invites...and I did not apply everywhere x2 <just look at the interview invites spreadsheet to see who's left
has baylor come out? (it seems that baylor houston already did)
baylor houston came out for internals only so far (pls correct this if I'm wrong)
< any external (non-rotators)?
yes!
External, non rotator, no ties. X1 << dates? 1/30 and 1/31 << thanks!
just got the loma linda interview- external, non rotator. dates are 1/30 and 1/31
heard it used to be great, but there have been some turnover with faculty (many leaving to USC, which is now considered a better program by some)> they have very little info on the website<anyone have any idea when the interview day will end?
email said around 1 oh please, I just hate the lies some times. USC as a health system was recently on probation. They are not jumping from UCLA in droves to USC.
this is actually not true - several faculty have been poached from UCLA to USC (in "droves") <yes, including USC's current PD and head Mohs surgeon.
before or after probation issues? Also 2 people don't constitute 'droves'
some after, some before. probation issues had nothing to do with the derm department. there are more than those 2.
either you have a UCLA invite and not a USC invite, or you haven't spent much time with both depts...
you don't have to believe me, look up their faculty list and see for yourself
☕☕☕
um, UCLA has like 8 more faculty than USC
quality, not quantity honey
<not a top CA program <There are many solid CA programs and UCLA is included in that. I know someone who ranked UCLA over UCSF & Stanford partially for locations reasons, but they did not feel like they were sacrificing quality of education. <Great location, but still not a top program compared to every others in CA. <true
not true
Stanford & UCSF are on another level, then UCSD, then UC-davis, UCLA & USC
would consider lower tier program. Not a department (it's a division under medicine) so there is limited upside for improvements. Location is amazing though if you want to be in SoCal x4 .
Would not say low tier. Would pick it above most of the 100+ programs, but not top tier/upper
In order: Stanford/USCF, UCSD, UC-Davis, UCLA, USC, UC-Irvine, Loma Linda/UCLA-Harbor, Kaiser Permanente, Opti West (Newport)
UCLA and UC Davis are not above USC
This one line represents the horrible sabotage that is going to plague every question about california programs this season
This whole thread is ridiculous. Pick whichever CA program suits you the best. Derm reputations are mostly based on how long the program has been around and how much research money they have. Remember that matching at a "top tier derm program" may be seen as > matching to other programs, but they're >>>>>>>>> not matching. Regardless, you'll be the envy of every other non-derm doctor
arent those the only two left? what about casewestern?
there's a lot left (loma linda, case western, einstein, brown ucla, fsu, temple, baylor in dallas, etc.)
I have about 10 places I applied to that have not sent invites/external invites...and I did not apply everywhere x2 <just look at the interview invites spreadsheet to see who's left
has baylor come out? (it seems that baylor houston already did)
baylor houston came out for internals only so far (pls correct this if I'm wrong)
Loma Linda out
Some posts are shown because their comments mention this program.
Honestly probably doesn't matter much at all. Chairs, PDs, and famous faculty move on. It's not the end of the world, unless there is a mass exodus of faculty all at the same time, I wouldn't worry at all